| Choose Your Language |
Constitution Of India Law 100 MCQ With Free Exam SET:-1
Q21. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer:
| List I (Principles) | List II (Case Law) |
| a. Equal work for Equal pay | 1. R. D. Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India |
| b. “Agencies or Instrumentalition” of the State are covered under The definition of State Under Artic le 12 of the Constitution | 2. Rudal Sah vs. State of Bihar |
| c. Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of state policy are Supplementary and complimentary To each other | 3. Randhir Singh vs. Union of India |
| d. Damages can awarded for Violation of Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 of Constitution | 4. Unikrishnan vs. State of Andhra Pradesh |
(A) a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
(B) a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4
(C) a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2
(D) a-2, b-4, c-3, d-1
Answer: a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
Q22. In case of inconsistency between laws made by Parliament and the laws made by the State Legislatures, which one of the following shall prevail ?
(A) The law made by Parliament before the law made by the legislature of the State
(B) The law made by Parliament after the law made by the legislature of the State
(C) The law made by Parliament before or after the law made by the legislature of the State
(D) The law made by the legislature of the State
Answer: The law made by Parliament before or after the law made by the legislature of the State
Q23. Article 262 of the Constitution of India relates to:
(A) Adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-State rivers or river valleys
(B) Provisions with respect to an inter-State Council
(C) Consolidated Funds and Public Accounts of India and of the States
(D) Contingency Fund
Answer: Adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-State rivers or river valleys
Q24. The method of judicial control over delegated legislation is by ‘issuing writs of mandamus, prohibition, certiorari and issuing injunctions’.
The statement is
(A) Wrong
(B) Half right
(C) Right
(D) None of the above
Answer: Right
Q25. Under Article 3 of Constitution the Parliament may by law form a new state. The Bill for the purpose shall be introduced in parliament except on recommendation of
(A) Prime Minister
(B) Speaker
(C) President
(D) Any member of Parliament
Answer: President
Q26. Part XIV-A entitled “Tribunals” was inserted by the Constitution (Forty Second) Amendment Act, 1976. Clause 2(d) of Article 323-A and Clause (3)(d) of Article 323-B excluded jurisdiction of all courts, except that of the Supreme Court under Article 136. In which case were these clauses struck down as being unconstitutional to the extent they barred the jurisdiction of the High Courts under Articles 226/227 and that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 ?
(A) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597
(B) Minerva Mills v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789
(C) S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918
(D) L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125
Answer: L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125
Q27. Fundamental Rights under the Constitution of India comprises of which of the following ?
1. Individual rights
2. Group rights
Select the correct answer:
(A) 1 only
(B) 2 only
(C) Both 1 and 2
(D) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: Both 1 and 2
Q28. In which recent judgment it was held that if landlord being State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution is required to prove fairness and reasonablness on its part in initiating proceeding, it is for it to show how its prayer meets the constitutional requirements of Article 14 of the Constitution
(A) Ashoka Marketing Ltd. v. Punjab National Bank
(B) New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
(C) Narendra Kumar Maheswari v. Union of India
(D) None of the above
Answer: New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
Q29. “Article 14 of the Indian Constitution allows classification but prohibits class legislation.” It was laid down in
(A) A. K. Gopalan case
(B) Maneka Gandhi case
(C) Anwar Ali Sarkar case
(D) Minerva Mill case
Answer: Anwar Ali Sarkar case
Q30. In case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was found conflicting with the two Articles
(A) Articles 14 and 17
(B) Articles 19 and 21
(C) Articles 23 and 25
(D) Articles 23 and 32
Answer: Articles 19 and 21